| 1 |
On Wed, 2004-06-30 at 09:51, Donnie Berkholz wrote: |
| 2 |
> On Wed, 2004-06-30 at 09:33, Chris Gianelloni wrote: |
| 3 |
> > Now, let's look at what it is linked against. This is on my work |
| 4 |
> > machine, so of course, USE flags will modify this list some, but the |
| 5 |
> > list is *quite* long here. |
| 6 |
|
| 7 |
As you can see, I did take USE into consideration. My point was really |
| 8 |
just that samba can have quite a few dependencies, so we would want to |
| 9 |
do something to control it. |
| 10 |
|
| 11 |
> > |
| 12 |
> > $ ldd smbmount |
| 13 |
> > linux-gate.so.1 => (0xffffe000) |
| 14 |
> > libcrypt.so.1 => /lib/libcrypt.so.1 (0x40023000) |
| 15 |
> > libresolv.so.2 => /lib/libresolv.so.2 (0x40050000) |
| 16 |
> > libnsl.so.1 => /lib/libnsl.so.1 (0x40062000) |
| 17 |
> > libdl.so.2 => /lib/libdl.so.2 (0x40076000) |
| 18 |
> > libgssapi_krb5.so.2 => /usr/lib/libgssapi_krb5.so.2 (0x4007a000) |
| 19 |
> > libkrb5.so.3 => /usr/lib/libkrb5.so.3 (0x40090000) |
| 20 |
> > libk5crypto.so.3 => /usr/lib/libk5crypto.so.3 (0x400fc000) |
| 21 |
> > libcom_err.so.3 => /usr/lib/libcom_err.so.3 (0x40126000) |
| 22 |
> > libldap.so.2 => /usr/lib/libldap.so.2 (0x40129000) |
| 23 |
> > liblber.so.2 => /usr/lib/liblber.so.2 (0x40159000) |
| 24 |
> > libc.so.6 => /lib/libc.so.6 (0x40167000) |
| 25 |
> > /lib/ld-linux.so.2 => /lib/ld-linux.so.2 (0x40000000) |
| 26 |
> > libssl.so.0.9.7 => /usr/lib/libssl.so.0.9.7 (0x40277000) |
| 27 |
> > libcrypto.so.0.9.7 => /usr/lib/libcrypto.so.0.9.7 (0x402a7000) |
| 28 |
> > |
| 29 |
> > Now, I could see that adding a hefty weight to our install media. If we |
| 30 |
> > really need to add samba to the LiveCD, then I think that we need to |
| 31 |
> > work something out. |
| 32 |
> |
| 33 |
> Also consider what USE flags you compiled samba with when making that |
| 34 |
> determination. Looks like you've got ldap and kerberos in USE, among |
| 35 |
> others. |
| 36 |
|
| 37 |
If we were to include samba, or more precisely smbmount and any |
| 38 |
*required* libraries, we would want to make sure that we turned off any |
| 39 |
support that wasn't necessary. I would think we would want to compile |
| 40 |
it with minimal options. Would we even require pam and readline in |
| 41 |
USE? I tend to think we could get away with building from the |
| 42 |
equivalent of USE=-* then only copying the smbmount and the required |
| 43 |
libraries to the actual system. We're looking for the equivalent of a |
| 44 |
"samba-client" package, without actually adding one to the tree. |
| 45 |
|
| 46 |
-- |
| 47 |
Chris Gianelloni |
| 48 |
Release Engineering QA Manager/Games Developer |
| 49 |
Gentoo Linux |
| 50 |
|
| 51 |
Is your power animal a penguin? |
Archives