On Mon, 2006-10-23 at 16:00 +0200, Michiel de Bruijne wrote:
> On Monday 23 October 2006 14:17, Chris Gianelloni wrote:
> > What would be best is if it looked for x.y.z first, then fell back to
> > x.y, in the case of us not being as fast with the config as the kernel
> > team with the kernel.  ;]
> >
> > Another thing to realize is that while I will apply new configs/patches,
> > I'm not planning on making a genkernel release for changes as minor as a
> > new config.  What I would suggest is that we make the "2.4" and "2.6"
> > configs be equal to the latest config, with the x.y.z being preferred,
> > if it exists.  That way, when a new kernel comes out, it will start out
> > using the last good config, until it gets updated with its own x.y.z
> > config.
> 
> Ok, do you want patches againt 3.4.2?

3.4.3, actually...

I just added it this morning and it currently matches SVN, for the most
part.  You can also check
http://sources.gentoo.org/viewcvs.py/genkernel/trunk/ to see what the
current SVN status is.  I did update the kernel sources today to add
lm_sensors and AGP/DRM support.

-- 
Chris Gianelloni
Release Engineering Strategic Lead
Alpha/AMD64/x86 Architecture Teams
Games Developer/Council Member/Foundation Trustee
Gentoo Foundation