1 |
On Mon, 12 Jan 2004 10:59:03 -0500 |
2 |
"John Davis" <zhen@g.o> wrote: |
3 |
|
4 |
> The openssl fix was both. The current version of openssl has TEXTREL |
5 |
> (static text relocations, compile w/ -fPIC to fix) in it, completely |
6 |
> negating the affects of hardening measures such as PaX (Address Space |
7 |
> Layout Randomisation). Even when not taking hardened into account, |
8 |
> TEXTREL is just not a good thing to have in .so's (see Debian's |
9 |
> development policy - they specifically disallow TEXTREL in shared |
10 |
> libraries). |
11 |
|
12 |
Is there a Gentoo bug or GLSA to track this then? In the future can we |
13 |
have issues like this brought up sooner? |
14 |
|
15 |
> Baselayout changes are essential if we want to have working LiveCDs. |
16 |
|
17 |
However, coming into the last 1.5 weeks or so before release without our |
18 |
build tools being fully functional, having to finish writing them, QA |
19 |
them as well as the release seems like a rather large and daunting task to |
20 |
try to adequately do in the timeframe provided, regardless of which arch |
21 |
you are on. |
22 |
|
23 |
> The purpose of the original release date was to meet LWE, but as it has |
24 |
> been mentioned before, it is not crucial to release on that date (the |
25 |
> 22nd). Gentoo is fluid, and so are our releases. Release when you can, |
26 |
> just try to be as close to the 22nd as you can be. Dates are not as |
27 |
> important as QA. |
28 |
|
29 |
Why can't we have one unified release date for all architectures, rather |
30 |
than one or two at a time? |
31 |
|
32 |
> Your assesment is unfair. Our goal, as well as yours, is to provide |
33 |
> excellent QA. If openssl and baselayout need bumped to fix security bugs |
34 |
> and CDBOOT problems, fine; we cannot release something that is broken. |
35 |
> The issue at hand has absolutely nothing to do with being a non-x86 |
36 |
> arch. I am sorry that it takes so long to build, but as I have said, |
37 |
> release when you can. No one has got you in a chokehold to release on |
38 |
> the 22nd. If you release on the 29th, I do not care. What I do care |
39 |
> about is QA. Make sure your release is tested, which I am sure you will |
40 |
> do. |
41 |
|
42 |
Then somewhere we need a release TODO list, that shows each task that |
43 |
needs to be completed and what it's current status is. This will allow us |
44 |
all to make better and more informed decisions. |
45 |
|
46 |
I'm not trying to be overly ornery here, I'm just trying to do the best |
47 |
job I can. |
48 |
|
49 |
-- |
50 |
Jason Wever |
51 |
Gentoo/Sparc Team Co-Lead |