1 |
On Tue, Jun 22, 2004 at 07:03:53PM -0400 or thereabouts, John Davis wrote: |
2 |
> I have no objections - 12.5 GB is tight, but it should meet our needs. |
3 |
> How flexible are you willing to be on that cap? +500MB, +250MB, +0MB? We |
4 |
> will try our best, but there is always the possibility of running over |
5 |
> the limit. |
6 |
|
7 |
500MB over is a bit high. I think 250MB is probably within reason. Again, |
8 |
the primary purpose is to allow our mirrors some sort of idea of what to |
9 |
expect so they can plan accordingly. |
10 |
|
11 |
--kurt |