1 |
On Wed, 2004-06-30 at 12:49, Kurt Lieber wrote: |
2 |
> We should be making decisions based on user demand, not our perception of |
3 |
> user demand. I searched for "samba livecd" on the forums and only found |
4 |
> one thread (out of over 1.25 million posts) where it was even discussed.[1] |
5 |
> That thread is almost 2 years old. Searching the gentoo-user archives, I |
6 |
> didn't find a single thread where users were asking for samba support on |
7 |
> the livecd. |
8 |
|
9 |
I agree. While I do think it would be a worthwhile venture to include |
10 |
the ability to mount a SMB share, it should definitely not come at the |
11 |
cost of dramatically enlarging our LiveCD. |
12 |
|
13 |
> Conversely, I have spoken to *several* people at the various LWEs who still |
14 |
> use the Gentoo Linux 1.2 installation CD. Why? Because it's ~15MB and |
15 |
> isn't loaded with bloat. (their words, not mine) |
16 |
|
17 |
I've been wondering what we can do to not only give users the |
18 |
functionality that they need to install, but also to keep the CD small. |
19 |
I will be focusing even more on this for 2004.3 and beyond, as I feel |
20 |
that we're now in the phase of stabilization for 2004.2 and don't want |
21 |
to change what we have now too dramatically. Sure, I'll test some new |
22 |
stuff, but it won't go onto the CDs, simply because there isn't enough |
23 |
time to test out new things for 2004.2 and ensure quality. I would love |
24 |
to see our CD go back below 32MB, and even lower, if possible. |
25 |
|
26 |
-- |
27 |
Chris Gianelloni |
28 |
Release Engineering QA Manager/Games Developer |
29 |
Gentoo Linux |
30 |
|
31 |
Is your power animal a penguin? |