| 1 |
On Thu, 15 Mar 2012 11:15:41 +0100 |
| 2 |
Kacper Kowalik <xarthisius@g.o> wrote: |
| 3 |
|
| 4 |
> On 03/15/2012 11:03 AM, Oliver Borm wrote: |
| 5 |
> > Hi, |
| 6 |
> > |
| 7 |
> > what are with users that only have write access to the original overlay? |
| 8 |
> > Do they need a github account in order to further contribute to the sci |
| 9 |
> > overlay? |
| 10 |
> It's not mandatory so they don't need to, though I've strongly encourage |
| 11 |
> to do so. |
| 12 |
> > What will happen if they push their changes just to g.o.g ? |
| 13 |
> When a person with access to both repos does git pull --all, it pull |
| 14 |
> changes from both, and during push --all it will be naturally migrated |
| 15 |
> to github. Of course it also works the other way around. As far as my |
| 16 |
> short experience with that workflow goes it's almost indistinguishable |
| 17 |
> to what we had so far. Only pull/push time is slightly longer |
| 18 |
|
| 19 |
It might be worth adding a "stable" branch to the |
| 20 |
repository. Goal there is that changes to into the |
| 21 |
trunk and ones found to work or that pass more tests |
| 22 |
can get selectively merged into the stable branch. |
| 23 |
|
| 24 |
Makes it easeir to catch minor bugs after a commit. |
| 25 |
|
| 26 |
|
| 27 |
-- |
| 28 |
Steven Lembark 3646 Flora Pl |
| 29 |
Workhorse Computing St Louis, MO 63110 |
| 30 |
lembark@×××××××.com +1 888 359 3508 |
Archives