| 1 |
On Thursday 14 September 2006 11:49, Andrey G. Grozin wrote: |
| 2 |
> On Thu, 14 Sep 2006, Marcus D. Hanwell wrote: |
| 3 |
> > Not sure about the links from the overlays.g.o, gentooscience.org was |
| 4 |
> > created before the overlays think had even been discussed as a solution |
| 5 |
> > to a problem. It is advertised here, and on the IRC channel but it would |
| 6 |
> > be good to get it more widely advertised. |
| 7 |
> |
| 8 |
> Yes. Now there is a link path from www.gentoo.org to overlays.gentoo.org, |
| 9 |
> and there is no link path from www.gentoo.org to gentooscience.org. And |
| 10 |
> this means that the whole world knows about the overlays at |
| 11 |
> overlays.gentoo.org, and nobody (except a few developers subscribed to |
| 12 |
> this list) knows about gentooscience.org. |
| 13 |
> |
| 14 |
> By the way, overlays.gentooscience.org uses trac and works stable. |
| 15 |
> |
| 16 |
I am well aware of that overlays uses trac too. I was just stating an opinion |
| 17 |
on the software. As far as I can tell gentooscience.org is running stable and |
| 18 |
I can no longer reproduce any error. |
| 19 |
|
| 20 |
The original error was due to mod_python needing to be rebuilt after an apache |
| 21 |
upgrade. Not sure why it didn't happen every time but without being informed |
| 22 |
about something I can't fix it... |
| 23 |
|
| 24 |
The original intent of the overlay was to create it for use by developers and |
| 25 |
interested users, i.e. people that might subscribe to lists like this. May be |
| 26 |
that intent has shifted over time and so promotion is now more important but |
| 27 |
it was announced in several places at the time. It should run stable and I |
| 28 |
will do what I can to fix it if not. |
Archives