Gentoo Archives: gentoo-science

From: Peter Bienstman <pbienst@g.o>
To: gentoo-science@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-science] lapack transition
Date: Sun, 21 Aug 2005 15:53:11
Message-Id: 200508211751.38733.pbienst@gentoo.org
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-science] lapack transition by "M. Edward (Ed) Borasky"
1 On Sunday 21 August 2005 17:33, M. Edward (Ed) Borasky wrote:
2 > I just returned to this list -- what is the "new infrastructure" we are
3 > "preparing for"?
4
5 The ability to switch between different lapack implementations (reference,
6 ATLAS, later perhaps MKL) at run time.
7
8 > Could we get a "testing/unstable" Atlas in Portage? Right now, they are
9 > at 3.7.10, and I only see a 3.7.10 for blas-atlas, not for atlas itself
10 > or lapack-atlas. I think the x86-64 users will want 3.7.10 across the
11 > board, and might also want to be able to compile selected code with GCC 4.
12
13 That's also on the TODO list.
14
15 Peter

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-science] lapack transition "M. Edward (Ed) Borasky" <znmeb@×××××××.net>