1 |
On 02/08/2012 01:31 AM, Alexey Shvetsov wrote: |
2 |
> fbissey@××××××××××××.nz писал 2012-02-07 23:52: |
3 |
>> Quoting Sébastien Fabbro <bicatali@g.o>: |
4 |
>> |
5 |
>>> Hi, |
6 |
>>> |
7 |
>>> We are contemplating the idea of switching the official science overlay |
8 |
>>> to an external repository such as github. Here are some of the |
9 |
>>> advantages we would like to |
10 |
>>> get: |
11 |
>>> 1. easier to contribute |
12 |
>>> 2. specific issue tracker |
13 |
>>> 3. wiki |
14 |
>>> |
15 |
>> Other people have made useful comments already. The only point that I |
16 |
>> think |
17 |
>> is interesting about github is the possibility to clone the overlay |
18 |
>> and have |
19 |
>> pull requests. |
20 |
>> Effectively that means people can contribute without ever getting infra |
21 |
>> involved and an external contributor can send a pull request even if |
22 |
>> they are |
23 |
>> not a member of the github science team. |
24 |
>> |
25 |
>> Francois |
26 |
> |
27 |
> Actualy you can send pull request even now =) Its git. See for example |
28 |
> linux kernel related work |
29 |
You can also git-format your patches and send it using git-am, gpg sign |
30 |
them and sed out typos on the fly. The point is that's not exactly |
31 |
simpler for someone who's doing his/her first commit than clicking a |
32 |
button on github :) |
33 |
Cheers, |
34 |
Kacper |