Archives
Archives
| From: | Kacper Kowalik <xarthisius@g.o> |
|---|---|
| To: | gentoo-science@l.g.o |
| Subject: | [gentoo-science] Gentoo Science next meeting agenda - 5) fortran |
| Date: | Sun, 05 Dec 2010 12:56:20 |
| Message-Id: | 4CFB8BCC.3070106@gentoo.org |
| 1 | Again, for the reference and starting point for the discussion |
| 2 | Donnie's blog post: |
| 3 | http://bit.ly/dLwdFe |
| 4 | |
| 5 | Additionally we should think about what compilers we're gonna support |
| 6 | (in term of b.g.o). I would like to stick to Intel and GFortran. |
| 7 | I have access to PGI, Pathscale and SunStudio but they were always a |
| 8 | PITA to use for me, so I would like to avoid them if possible... |
| 9 | Cheers, |
| 10 | Kacper |
| File name | MIME type |
|---|---|
| signature.asc | application/pgp-signature |
| Subject | Author |
|---|---|
| Re: [gentoo-science] Gentoo Science next meeting agenda - 5) fortran | George Shapovalov <george@g.o> |