1 |
Markus Dittrich wrote: |
2 |
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- |
3 |
> Hash: SHA1 |
4 |
> |
5 |
> On Fri, 18 May 2007, M. Edward (Ed) Borasky wrote: |
6 |
> |
7 |
>> Is this applicable to the Gentoo ebuilds? |
8 |
>> |
9 |
> |
10 |
> Hi Ed, |
11 |
> |
12 |
> What exactly are you referring to? The part about |
13 |
> ATL_MaxMalloc? If so, I haven't done any benchmarking |
14 |
> yet, but I don't see a problem increasing this |
15 |
> value to 160M as suggested by Clint. |
16 |
> |
17 |
> cheers, |
18 |
> Markus |
19 |
> |
20 |
> |
21 |
> - -- Markus Dittrich (markusle) |
22 |
> Gentoo Linux Developer |
23 |
> Scientific applications |
24 |
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- |
25 |
> Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux) |
26 |
> |
27 |
> iD8DBQFGTf8txlRwCwb7k40RAmfSAJ9r5K/RD+4rxJbFm7NDH+ONWoy1ZwCeKLNL |
28 |
> y0jHAOSCmQI+V5mKzcWsjcE= |
29 |
> =LpY6 |
30 |
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- |
31 |
Yeah ... I just got an Athlon64 X2 4200+ and the first thing I did when |
32 |
I got the machine stabilized was build "blas-atlas" and "lapack-atlas" |
33 |
(3.7.30). New versions of Atlas generally show up in Portage or the |
34 |
science overlay within a day after Clint releases them, so I don't |
35 |
usually test the upstream source. |
36 |
|
37 |
The best I got out of my machine was something like 7 GFLOPS on a 32-bit |
38 |
test with 3.7.30, and there were some cases that looked like they should |
39 |
have done better. So I definitely want to test this 160M setting. |
40 |
-- |
41 |
gentoo-science@g.o mailing list |