| 1 |
On 06/12/10 17:14, Donnie Berkholz wrote: |
| 2 |
> On 08:52 Mon 06 Dec , justin wrote: |
| 3 |
>> Hi all, |
| 4 |
>> |
| 5 |
>> the tcl herd is more or less dead. As there a many sci apps which rely |
| 6 |
>> on tcl/tk, the question is, how we should deal with this? Contribute, |
| 7 |
>> take over...? |
| 8 |
>> |
| 9 |
>> Lets discuss this. |
| 10 |
>> |
| 11 |
>> One simple question, I was asked by a user, should the header |
| 12 |
>> directories should be somehow generalized? |
| 13 |
>> |
| 14 |
>> /usr/include/tcl8.5 -> /usr/include/tcl8.5.9 |
| 15 |
>> /usr/include/tcl8 -> /usr/include/tcl8.5.9 |
| 16 |
>> /usr/include/tcl -> /usr/include/tcl8.5.9 |
| 17 |
>> |
| 18 |
>> This would simplify cases where the buildsystem has hardcoded paths. |
| 19 |
> |
| 20 |
> Don't the directories reflect tcl "ABIs", not just some kind of |
| 21 |
> arbitrary version? |
| 22 |
> |
| 23 |
|
| 24 |
They do as far as I understand. But as we do not slot them, we could |
| 25 |
take care with depending on a certain version, if not every version is |
| 26 |
suitable. |
Archives