1 |
> EL Sat, 4 Jun 2011 12:15:18 +1200 |
2 |
> |
3 |
> ls -la /usr/lib64/libcblas.so |
4 |
> lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 26 2 jun 13:44 /usr/lib64/libcblas.so -> |
5 |
> blas/reference/libcblas.so |
6 |
> |
7 |
> ls -la /usr/lib64/libblas.so |
8 |
> lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 25 2 jun 13:43 /usr/lib64/libblas.so -> |
9 |
> blas/reference/libblas.so |
10 |
> |
11 |
> ls -la /usr/lib64/liblapack.so |
12 |
> lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 29 2 jun 13:47 /usr/lib64/liblapack.so -> |
13 |
> lapack/reference/liblapack.so |
14 |
> |
15 |
> It looks reasonable to me. |
16 |
It does. Yet your scipy doesn't link to anything blas related according |
17 |
to the output of ldd that you sent. |
18 |
I note you are using numpy-1.6.0 I don't if that's linked to that but sage |
19 |
will not work properly with it: |
20 |
http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/11334 |
21 |
Can you try again with numpy-1.5.1 at least. |
22 |
And then what are the outputs of: |
23 |
ldd /usr/lib64/python2.7/site-packages/numpy/core/_dotblas.so |
24 |
ldd /usr/lib64/python2.7/site-packages/numpy/linalg/lapack_lite.so |
25 |
|
26 |
Francois |