Gentoo Archives: gentoo-science

From: "François Bissey" <fbissey@××××××××××××.nz>
To: gentoo-science@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-science] blas selection in lapack-reference
Date: Wed, 22 Jan 2014 09:54:53
Message-Id: aa3d32b86d5dda0f42756d75035a4b67@slingshot.co.nz
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-science] blas selection in lapack-reference by Reinis Danne
1 On 2014-01-22 22:47, Reinis Danne wrote:
2 > On Tue, Jan 21, 2014 at 07:47:48PM -0600, Steven Trogdon wrote:
3 >> On Wed, 22 Jan 2014 13:52:57 +1300
4 >> François Bissey <fbissey@××××××××××××.nz> wrote:
5 >>
6 >> > We have yet another instance of someone emerging lapack-reference
7 >> > without
8 >> > a valid blas configuration in
9 >> > https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=498490
10 >> > (not their original problem).
11 >> > I think we should do something about this in lapack-reference and
12 >> > possibly
13 >> > other ebuilds.
14 >> > In pkg_setup, we could run
15 >> > eselect blas update
16 >> > to make sure that a valid configuration is active
17 >> > and display an informational message about the blas provider
18 >> > used with the output of
19 >> > eselect blas show
20 >> >
21 >> > Who thinks is a good/bad idea?
22 >> >
23 >> > Francois
24 >> >
25 >>
26 >> For one, I'm in favor of something like this - though I probably don't
27 >> have
28 >> much say in the matter. I've been bitten by not eselecting {blas,
29 >> cblas,
30 >> lapack} after an upgrade. And I've even posted on this forum the
31 >> problem.
32 >>
33 >> http://article.gmane.org/gmane.linux.gentoo.science/1915
34 >> http://article.gmane.org/gmane.linux.gentoo.science/1916
35 >>
36 >> I resolved things, quite accidently, by re-eselecting the important
37 >> components which were eselected before the upgrade.
38 >>
39 >> Steve
40 >>
41 >
42 > I fixed provider selection during upgrades in overlay
43 > (yesterday). Now it should have valid provider set at any time.
44 > With that do you still think it would need this extra eselect
45 > update in ebuild?
46 >
47 >
48 It seems that the difficult point is when you go from no provider
49 available
50 to one provider available. If that case is fixed then: No
51
52 Francois

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-science] blas selection in lapack-reference Reinis Danne <rei4dan@×××××.com>