Gentoo Archives: gentoo-science

From: Francois Bissey <fbissey@××××××××××××.nz>
To: gentoo-science@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-science] can't emerge sage because a dependency is not in portage
Date: Mon, 10 Sep 2012 09:03:07
Message-Id: 504DA81B.9000001@slingshot.co.nz
In Reply to: [gentoo-science] can't emerge sage because a dependency is not in portage by sitquietly
1 On 10/09/12 10:14, sitquietly wrote:
2 > For the past several weeks I've found it impossible to emerge sage from the
3 > sage-on-gentoo overlay because the ebuild for sage-5.2 (~amd64) and
4 > sage-5.3_beta2 (masked) requires ~dev-python/networkx-1.6. However
5 > networkx-1.6 is not in portage any longer; networkx-1.2 is in the overlay and
6 > networkx-1.7 is in portage.
7 >
8 > sage-5.1 had a networkx-1.6 specific patch but I don't see any patches in
9 > sage-5.2 that are networkx specific.
10 >
11 > Should I copy the sage ebuild into my local overlay and change the dependency
12 > to networkx-1.7? I'd be glad to be warned if any one knows of any problem I
13 > would encounter before I invest the time to try emerging sage to use the newer
14 > version of networkx.
15 >
16 > I also was wondering why dev-python/networkx is required; I thought that
17 > networkx was integrated into sage?
18 >
19 >
20
21 Hi,
22
23 I don't really understand how it comes that you don't have network-1.6
24 in your tree. It's definitely still there:
25 http://sources.gentoo.org/cgi-bin/viewvc.cgi/gentoo-x86/dev-python/networkx/
26
27 The point of sage-on-gentoo is two fold:
28 1) system integration
29 2) complete unbundling
30 sage-5.1 in the overlay had a patch because upstream was still at
31 networkx-1.2 and I wanted to switch early since the patch was ready to
32 go for sage 5.2. sage 5.2 uses networkx-1.6 by default. I don't remember
33 testing if 1.7 was ok. But 1.6 is in the tree.
34
35 Francois

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-science] can't emerge sage because a dependency is not in portage sitquietly <forestmoonsilence@×××××.com>