From: | "Sébastien Fabbro" <bicatali@g.o> | ||
---|---|---|---|
To: | gentoo-science@l.g.o | ||
Subject: | Re: [gentoo-science] should we have virtual/clapack | ||
Date: | Mon, 07 Dec 2009 17:30:02 | ||
Message-Id: | 20091207092932.0e56aafb@canfar.phys.uvic.ca | ||
In Reply to: | [gentoo-science] should we have virtual/clapack by "François Bissey" |
1 | On Sunday 06 December, François Bissey wrote: |
2 | |
3 | > on a clapack implementations. So should we plan for a virtual/clapack? |
4 | |
5 | I don't know of an official ANSI/ISO C API for clapack. |
6 | The netlib clapack implementation is a f2c'ed conversion from |
7 | Fortran lapack. There is another clapack in ATLAS, which has a |
8 | different API, and does not cover all LAPACK routines. |
9 | |
10 | -- |
11 | Sebastien |
Subject | Author |
---|---|
Re: [gentoo-science] should we have virtual/clapack | "François Bissey" <f.r.bissey@×××××××××.nz> |