| 1 |
On 21/01/14 18:04, Sébastien Fabbro wrote: |
| 2 |
> * given the number of bugs, we should keep the linking to the reference |
| 3 |
> names libraries, so we could eselect providers without re-compiling all |
| 4 |
> reverse dependencies. We could do this in the open sourced providers by |
| 5 |
> changing the soname of the libraries we compile, and in the binary ones |
| 6 |
> (mkl,amcl...) with a link script generated library. |
| 7 |
|
| 8 |
I don't get this point. Why do we need to play around with sonames? |
| 9 |
Doesn't this bring more problems and maintainer burden then letting the |
| 10 |
consumer recompile reverse dependencies? Are the libs all ABI compatible? |
| 11 |
|
| 12 |
Jusitn |
Archives