| 1 |
2006-06-25, George Shapovalov sanoi, jotta: |
| 2 |
|
| 3 |
> There was a suggestion for sci-phonetics or sci-linguistics. There is |
| 4 |
> a dev (translator's team, so he will need to be mentored for the |
| 5 |
> "generic development") who is willing to take on those, |
| 6 |
|
| 7 |
That would be me. Hi, all! I’d assume that the mentoring and becoming a |
| 8 |
developer process for me will not be much different than anyone else. |
| 9 |
|
| 10 |
> however I |
| 11 |
> first need to see how many packages would be there. If anything it |
| 12 |
> will be good to have him as a part of the team, even if this does not |
| 13 |
> qualify for a full category (but still should be good for herd I |
| 14 |
> guess..) |
| 15 |
|
| 16 |
At current I’m only familiar with a few phonetics software, that could |
| 17 |
be added. Also, many of the phonetics libraries are already in tree, in |
| 18 |
app-accessibility (e.g. festival and all related stuff). |
| 19 |
|
| 20 |
From other linguistics software I've been thinking e.g. natural |
| 21 |
language grammar system Malaga |
| 22 |
<http://home.arcor.de/bjoern-beutel/malaga/>, and perhaps related |
| 23 |
grammar dictionaries. If the grammar dictionaries are added as separate |
| 24 |
packages, they will at least increase the number of packages in |
| 25 |
nicely :-) |
| 26 |
|
| 27 |
-- |
| 28 |
Flammie, Gentoo Linux Documentation’s Finnish head translator |
| 29 |
and FlameEyes’ bot <http://dev.gentoo.org/~flammie>. |
Archives