| 1 |
Hi, |
| 2 |
|
| 3 |
On Friday 13 August 2010 00:54:53 Steven Trogdon wrote: |
| 4 |
> Hi Christopher, |
| 5 |
> |
| 6 |
> On 08/12/2010 03:16:44 PM, Christopher Schwan wrote: |
| 7 |
> > Hi, |
| 8 |
> > |
| 9 |
> > On Thursday 12 August 2010 17:37:34 Steven Trogdon wrote: |
| 10 |
> >> Hi: |
| 11 |
> >> |
| 12 |
> >> I had apparently installed the Sage-provided scripts |
| 13 |
> >> |
| 14 |
> >> sage-g77_shared |
| 15 |
> >> sage_fortran |
| 16 |
> |
| 17 |
> <SNIP> |
| 18 |
> |
| 19 |
> > Thats absolutely right - thank you for pointing that out. I have added |
| 20 |
> > these files for now, but I think I will write a fix so we wont need |
| 21 |
> > these. |
| 22 |
> > |
| 23 |
> >> Steve |
| 24 |
> > |
| 25 |
> > Christopher |
| 26 |
> |
| 27 |
> Relative to the included files, it appears that with the Sage-provided |
| 28 |
> sage-g77_shared script, sage_fortran can't just point to the fortran |
| 29 |
> compiler since sage_fortran needs to have arguments, i.e. the "$@" is |
| 30 |
> needed in using sage_fortran. |
| 31 |
|
| 32 |
"$@" just adds the command line arguments given to sage_fortran to fortran, |
| 33 |
which is what a symlink implicitly does. |
| 34 |
|
| 35 |
> |
| 36 |
> Steve |
| 37 |
|
| 38 |
Christopher |
Archives