1 |
On 10/05/10 - 18:57:56, François Bissey wrote: |
2 |
> > Hi group! |
3 |
> > |
4 |
> > I've got some problems installing sci-mathematics/maxima in both my |
5 |
> Funtoo |
6 |
> > boxes. |
7 |
> > |
8 |
> > http://paste.pocoo.org/show/271383/ |
9 |
> > |
10 |
> > The issue seems to be similar to : |
11 |
> > http://github.com/cschwan/sage-on-gentoo/issues/issue/14, and the |
12 |
> > work-around to redefining LDFLAGS works as well. However, something |
13 |
> is |
14 |
> > wrong with the way maxima deals with the LDFLAGS. |
15 |
> > |
16 |
> OK I will have a look, it may be something I overlooked in my |
17 |
> patches, it used |
18 |
> to work here, so it may be caused by a slight change somewhere in the |
19 |
> system |
20 |
> since then. |
21 |
> |
22 |
> If you want maxima for sage you don't have to use the version located |
23 |
> in the |
24 |
> science overlay. It was a proof of concept for some patches. The |
25 |
> version in |
26 |
> portage will work just as well. |
27 |
> 5.20.1-r2 |
28 |
> Francois |
29 |
> |
30 |
For what it's worth, on my amd64 I'm unable to build the portage |
31 |
maxima-5.20.1-r2 either with |
32 |
|
33 |
LDFLAGS="-Wl,-01 -Wl,--sort-common -Wl,--as-needed" |
34 |
|
35 |
There is the same |
36 |
|
37 |
make[1]: *** [binary-ecl/maxima] Error 1 |
38 |
|
39 |
In fact ecls will not even configure with the indicated LDFLAGS. |
40 |
Deleting "-Wl,--sort-common" allows ecls as well as maxima to be built. |
41 |
|
42 |
Steve |