From: | Patrick Kursawe <phosphan@g.o> | ||
---|---|---|---|
To: | gentoo-science@l.g.o | ||
Subject: | Re: [gentoo-science] openmodelica and salome | ||
Date: | Tue, 20 Dec 2005 16:51:30 | ||
Message-Id: | 20051220165051.GA24329@zaphod.anachem.ruhr-uni-bochum.de | ||
In Reply to: | [gentoo-science] openmodelica and salome by Fabian Braennstroem |
1 | Hi there, |
2 | |
3 | On Mon, Dec 19, 2005 at 07:59:55PM +0100, Fabian Braennstroem wrote: |
4 | |
5 | > I wonder if anybody could install openmodelica and salome |
6 | > using any ebuild? |
7 | > |
8 | > The page for modelica: |
9 | > http://www.ida.liu.se/~pelab/modelica/OpenModelica.html |
10 | > |
11 | > I saw some discussions about salome, but I am not sure if |
12 | > there exists any ebuild yet!? |
13 | |
14 | You can file an enhancement request on http://bugs.gentoo.org |
15 | and try to write an ebuild for those packages |
16 | http://www.gentoo.org/proj/en/devrel/handbook/handbook.xml?part=2&chap=1 |
17 | http://www.gentoo.org/doc/en/ebuild-submit.xml |
18 | |
19 | Since there are more people who want to have packages in the portage tree |
20 | than people who can integrate and maintain them, the sci herd currently has |
21 | about 175 open enhancement requests waiting, dating back more than two |
22 | years. But don't be afraid, they are not processed in chronological order. |
23 | So if you can tell what makes these packages so special and important |
24 | there's the chance some developer will have a look at them. |
25 | |
26 | HTH, |
27 | |
28 | Patrick |
Subject | Author |
---|---|
Re: [gentoo-science] openmodelica and salome | Fabian Braennstroem <f.braennstroem@×××.de> |