| 1 |
On 19:42 Mon 19 Sep 2011, James Cloos wrote: |
| 2 |
> >>>>> "TK" == Thomas Kahle <tomka@g.o> writes: |
| 3 |
> |
| 4 |
> TK> any objections against removing scilab-4 from the tree? |
| 5 |
> TK> https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=360601 |
| 6 |
> |
| 7 |
> How about waiting until a *working* ebuild exists for scilab-5? |
| 8 |
|
| 9 |
Honestly, I don't see that happening. But we can wait and see. |
| 10 |
|
| 11 |
> The existing one has never worked (on ~amd64 or ~x86). |
| 12 |
|
| 13 |
Same here, but it's a couple of months since I tried. My problem with |
| 14 |
giganto packages like this: It's easy to download the precompiled binary |
| 15 |
that just works, but tilting at windmills to enforce the Gentoo way. |
| 16 |
|
| 17 |
Cheers, |
| 18 |
Thomas |
| 19 |
|
| 20 |
-- |
| 21 |
Thomas Kahle |
| 22 |
http://dev.gentoo.org/~tomka/ |
Archives