| 1 |
There are some other miscellaneous lam-mpi / mpich |
| 2 |
dependencies/conflicts/gotchas in Portage; you probably won't see them |
| 3 |
unless you're using ~x86 and trying to load the R packages that use |
| 4 |
them. When I get some free time I'll document everything in Bugzilla. |
| 5 |
|
| 6 |
Meanwhile, speaking of R, they are at R-2.2.0 and counting -- 2.3 should |
| 7 |
be out in the spring. Portage appears to be stuck at R-2.1.1. Is there |
| 8 |
any reason there hasn't been an R version bump? |
| 9 |
|
| 10 |
Donnie Berkholz wrote: |
| 11 |
|
| 12 |
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- |
| 13 |
> Hash: SHA1 |
| 14 |
> |
| 15 |
> Philippe Trottier wrote: |
| 16 |
> | I have stooped using mpich and started use lam-mpi take a look at |
| 17 |
> that ? |
| 18 |
> |
| 19 |
> That's ironic, because the lam-mpi team has stopped developing lam-mpi |
| 20 |
> and now works on openmpi [1], along with a number of other groups. =) |
| 21 |
> |
| 22 |
> As far as moving into the future for MPI in Gentoo goes, there's an |
| 23 |
> mpich2 ebuild in progress, and we'll probably start working on an |
| 24 |
> openmpi ebuild once they have a 1.0 release. |
| 25 |
> |
| 26 |
> Thanks, |
| 27 |
> Donnie |
| 28 |
> |
| 29 |
> 1. http://www.open-mpi.org/ |
| 30 |
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- |
| 31 |
> Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (GNU/Linux) |
| 32 |
> |
| 33 |
> iD8DBQFDe6UHXVaO67S1rtsRAiPdAKD/G/r7DHRXymnwsoqnBzLr5xjNdgCgl7Et |
| 34 |
> WskpoCWoUJpddnTsm4bI2e4= |
| 35 |
> =/vLx |
| 36 |
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- |
| 37 |
|
| 38 |
|
| 39 |
-- |
| 40 |
M. Edward (Ed) Borasky |
| 41 |
|
| 42 |
http://linuxcapacityplanning.com |
| 43 |
|
| 44 |
-- |
| 45 |
gentoo-science@g.o mailing list |
Archives