| 1 |
On Sunday 21 August 2005 7:43 am, Peter Bienstman wrote: |
| 2 |
> Hi, |
| 3 |
> |
| 4 |
> I've been looking through the tree to see which packages use lapack/blas, |
| 5 |
> and which of them are prepared for the new infrastructure. There are |
| 6 |
> actually far less packages than I anticipated: |
| 7 |
> |
| 8 |
> Still depends on old infrastructure: |
| 9 |
> |
| 10 |
> sys-cluster/hpl |
| 11 |
> |
| 12 |
> Already uses virtual/blas or virtual/lapack in unstable branch: |
| 13 |
> |
| 14 |
> dev-lang/R |
| 15 |
> sci-geosciences/grass |
| 16 |
> sci-misc/camfr |
| 17 |
> sci-chemistry/mpqc |
| 18 |
> sci-mathematics/octave |
| 19 |
> sci-misc/xfoil |
| 20 |
> |
| 21 |
> Uses own code, but could benefit from transition: |
| 22 |
> |
| 23 |
> dev-python/numeric (see http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=81520) |
| 24 |
|
| 25 |
I use numeric and scipy, and have been trying for a long time to improve the |
| 26 |
ebuilds to use blas/lapack/atlas. I submitted an ebuild for numeric six |
| 27 |
months ago (http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=81520), but it has |
| 28 |
languished in buzilla because it is not clear how to deal with ATLAS (my |
| 29 |
atlas USE flag was rejected). How should ATLAS dependencies be handled in the |
| 30 |
new infrastructure? |
| 31 |
|
| 32 |
-- |
| 33 |
Darren S. Dale |
| 34 |
|
| 35 |
Bard Hall |
| 36 |
Department of Materials Science and Engineering |
| 37 |
Cornell University |
| 38 |
Ithaca, NY. 14850 |
| 39 |
|
| 40 |
dd55@×××××××.edu |
| 41 |
http://people.ccmr.cornell.edu/~dd55/ |
| 42 |
-- |
| 43 |
gentoo-science@g.o mailing list |
Archives