Gentoo Archives: gentoo-science

From: "François Bissey" <frp.bissey@×××××.com>
To: gentoo-science@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-science] cblas, blas, lapack
Date: Tue, 19 Jun 2018 00:44:23
Message-Id: 633B6573-BC65-40FA-9BC8-1365770A33A3@gmail.com
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-science] cblas, blas, lapack by "François Bissey"
1 Right are starting to find the github issue. If I send a PR (which will
2 be trivial) will there be a kind soul to merge it.
3
4 François
5
6 > On 16/06/2018, at 14:41, François Bissey <frp.bissey@×××××.com> wrote:
7 >
8 > See https://github.com/gentoo/sci/issues/870 someone with write access to the overlay
9 > could easily fix the mistake from the last version bump. There was no need to
10 > change alternatives-common.bash and the changes are breaking the way alternatives
11 > are installed.
12 >
13 > François
14 >
15 >> On 16/06/2018, at 13:55, Andrey G. Grozin <A.G.Grozin@×××××××.su> wrote:
16 >>
17 >> On Fri, 15 Jun 2018, Juergen Rose wrote:
18 >>> I have similar errors, see e.g.: https://bugs.gentoo.org/658170,
19 >>> https://bugs.gentoo.org/657984, https://bugs.gentoo.org/658034 or https
20 >>> ://bugs.gentoo.org/658026.
21 >>> I have the feeling that theese problems with blas, lapack, atlas etc.
22 >>> are not directly related to the 17.0 profile. I switched to the 17.0
23 >>> profile in December and begin of January and I was still able to emerge
24 >>> atlas Jan 3rd:
25 >> I cannot emerge atlas: bug #603324
26 >> Now I see there's also #658026.
27 >> So it seems there are no usable blas/lapack packages in the overlay :-(
28 >>
29 >> Andrey
30 >>
31 >
32 >

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-science] cblas, blas, lapack Benda Xu <heroxbd@g.o>