1 |
On 20/01/14 18:53, Reinis Danne wrote: |
2 |
> Hi! |
3 |
> |
4 |
> I have cleaned up a bit alternatives-2.eclass to make it easier to review. |
5 |
> Also if someone knows any shortcommings of this eclass as it is, then point |
6 |
> it out, I'll try to address them. |
7 |
> |
8 |
> I hope this can be soon moved to the main tree thus closing the divide between |
9 |
> science overlay and portage tree. |
10 |
> |
11 |
> Reinis Danne (10): |
12 |
> alternatives-2.eclass: Update copyright |
13 |
> alternatives-2.eclass: Remove unused variables |
14 |
> alternatives-2.eclass: Move EXPORT_FUNCTIONS to top |
15 |
> alternatives-2.eclass: Remove commented-out code |
16 |
> alternatives-2.eclass: Put commonly used path in local variable |
17 |
> alternatives-2.eclass: Fix eclass name in comments |
18 |
> alternatives-2.eclass: Add EAPI check |
19 |
> alternatives-2.eclass: Add documentation comments |
20 |
> alternatives-2.eclass: Minor comment changes |
21 |
> alternatives-2.eclass: Use consistent quoting |
22 |
> |
23 |
> eclass/alternatives-2.eclass | 110 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------------ |
24 |
> 1 file changed, 79 insertions(+), 31 deletions(-) |
25 |
> |
26 |
|
27 |
Thanks for all your work. |
28 |
|
29 |
Sebastien, Dennis, Ulrich and everybody else, let's gather a list of the |
30 |
remaining issue to resolve. |
31 |
|
32 |
|
33 |
Reinis, could you branch the sci overlay on github and and push your |
34 |
changes there. Everybody, let's stick to clear commit msgs for the |
35 |
eclass so that the review goes easy. |
36 |
|
37 |
Justin |
38 |
|
39 |
P.s. Sorry guys for CCing you directly. I am not sure if you are all |
40 |
following the list. |