Gentoo Archives: gentoo-science

From: Peter Bienstman <pbienst@g.o>
To: gentoo-science@l.g.o
Cc: sci@g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-science] {blas,lapack}-config versus eselect
Date: Thu, 01 Sep 2005 14:03:58
Message-Id: 200509011603.01374.pbienst@gentoo.org
In Reply to: [gentoo-science] {blas,lapack}-config versus eselect by Danny van Dyk
1 On Wednesday 31 August 2005 23:27, Danny van Dyk wrote:
2
3 > If nobody objects, I'd like to move all packages in the tree to PDEPEND
4 > on eselect instead of {R}DEPENDing on {blas,lapack}-config.
5
6 Sounds like the way to go. This will probably delay marking lapack-atlas and
7 friends as stable a bit, but that's not a big issue.
8
9 In related news, I've converted sys-cluster/hpl to virtual/lapack. This leaves
10 scilab as the last package that still requires the old infrastructure.
11
12 Peter