From: | Peter Bienstman <pbienst@g.o> |
---|---|
To: | sci@g.o, gentoo-science@l.g.o |
Subject: | [gentoo-science] lapack transition |
Date: | Sun, 21 Aug 2005 11:44:30 |
Message-Id: | 200508211343.48047.pbienst@gentoo.org |
1 | Hi, |
2 | |
3 | I've been looking through the tree to see which packages use lapack/blas, and |
4 | which of them are prepared for the new infrastructure. There are actually far |
5 | less packages than I anticipated: |
6 | |
7 | Still depends on old infrastructure: |
8 | |
9 | sys-cluster/hpl |
10 | |
11 | Already uses virtual/blas or virtual/lapack in unstable branch: |
12 | |
13 | dev-lang/R |
14 | sci-geosciences/grass |
15 | sci-misc/camfr |
16 | sci-chemistry/mpqc |
17 | sci-mathematics/octave |
18 | sci-misc/xfoil |
19 | |
20 | Uses own code, but could benefit from transition: |
21 | |
22 | dev-python/numeric (see http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=81520) |
23 | |
24 | Peter |
Subject | Author |
---|---|
Re: [gentoo-science] lapack transition | Darren Dale <dd55@×××××××.edu> |
Re: [gentoo-science] lapack transition | "M. Edward (Ed) Borasky" <znmeb@×××××××.net> |