1 |
On 11:57 Sun 05 Dec , Sébastien Fabbro wrote: |
2 |
> Kacper Kowalik wrote: |
3 |
> |
4 |
> > As we can see |
5 |
> > * sci-physics \in sci |
6 |
> > * sci-chemistry \in sci (except Donnie) |
7 |
> > * sci-biology \in sci |
8 |
> > * sci-mathematics \in sci (except Rafael) |
9 |
|
10 |
What you've proven is that they should definitely not be merged, because |
11 |
not everyone in sci is in every sub-team. |
12 |
|
13 |
> Splitting herds is not only be about email receiving which can be |
14 |
> easily turned on by adding an email to the alias or turned off with |
15 |
> procmail rules. |
16 |
> I was thinking also about web page, profiles, and may be as Rafael |
17 |
> showed it would create a sense of more accessible community. I can see |
18 |
> how people might discard the possibility of devship by seeing a few |
19 |
> hundreds packages and bugs in one giant herd. |
20 |
> |
21 |
> For those of us interested in all science packages, we could simply put |
22 |
> sci as alias of all sci sub herds, or even create QA sci. |
23 |
|
24 |
I would be on the sci alias because I would care about stuff that's |
25 |
relevant to *all* sci, not to one of the many subsets of it. |
26 |
|
27 |
-- |
28 |
Thanks, |
29 |
Donnie |
30 |
|
31 |
Donnie Berkholz |
32 |
Sr. Developer, Science Team |
33 |
Gentoo Linux |
34 |
Blog: http://dberkholz.wordpress.com |