| 1 |
> François, |
| 2 |
> |
| 3 |
> The patches to pexpect do allow the notebook to function. However, with the |
| 4 |
> new patches to pexpect when I, from the notebook, do |
| 5 |
> |
| 6 |
> g=sin(x); plot(g,(x,-pi,3*pi/2)) |
| 7 |
> |
| 8 |
> I get |
| 9 |
> |
| 10 |
> import os;os.chdir("/tmp/tmpo2KomY"); |
| 11 |
> execfile("_sage_input_1.py")Python 2.6.4 (r264:75706, Mar 4 2010, |
| 12 |
> 21:15:13) |
| 13 |
> [GCC 4.3.4] on linux2 |
| 14 |
> Type "help", "copyright", "credits" or "license" for more information. |
| 15 |
> |
| 16 |
> >>> import os;os.chdir("/tmp/tmpo2KomY"); |
| 17 |
> >>> execfile("_sage_input_1.py") |
| 18 |
> |
| 19 |
> START1 |
| 20 |
> |
| 21 |
> import os;os.chdir("/tmp/tmpY61yjM"); |
| 22 |
> execfile("_sage_input_2.py") |
| 23 |
> |
| 24 |
> import os;os.chdir("/tmp/tmpXjmsQK"); |
| 25 |
> execfile("_sage_input_3.py") |
| 26 |
> __SAGE__ |
| 27 |
> __SAGE__import os;os.chdir("/tmp/tmpY61yjM"); |
| 28 |
> __SAGE__execfile("_sage_input_2.py") |
| 29 |
> START2 |
| 30 |
> __SAGE__ |
| 31 |
> __SAGE__import os;os.chdir("/tmp/tmpXjmsQK"); |
| 32 |
> |
| 33 |
> The result should be the indicated graph in the notebook. So there still |
| 34 |
> must be some functional differences between the pexpect-2.4-r1 in |
| 35 |
> sage-on-gentoo and the pexpect-2.0_p4 provide by Sage. |
| 36 |
Hi Steve, |
| 37 |
|
| 38 |
Bummer. pexpect after 2.0 is a rewrite apparently. There is talk |
| 39 |
about porting sage to a newer pexpect provided performance is |
| 40 |
not abysmal. If it is broken, they may never want to upgrade. |
| 41 |
Well I guess you just provided some material for discussion on sage-devel. |
| 42 |
We may try a patched pexpect-2.0 for now, but that's a real pita. |
| 43 |
|
| 44 |
Thanks for your testing Steve. |
| 45 |
|
| 46 |
Francois |
Archives