1 |
On AD 2008 February 07 Thursday 07:07:24 AM -0800, M. Edward (Ed) Borasky wrote: |
2 |
> "Modeling" is too vague a word to get a meaningful response. However, I'll |
3 |
> assume that, since it's astrophysics, that you're solving some equations. |
4 |
> There are two ways to solve equations, numeric and symbolic. You can also |
5 |
> mix these approaches, although that's more difficult. |
6 |
|
7 |
The equation solving is pretty easily done by hand so far. |
8 |
|
9 |
> So ... can you specify the nature of the model? Is it equation-based? |
10 |
> Numerical? Symbolic? Algebraic? Integral? Differential? None of the above? |
11 |
|
12 |
This is the part I don't quite understand. Maybe I should ask my |
13 |
advisor and then I can come back with a more specific question, but in the |
14 |
movies modeling usually consists of a fancy full color 3D graphical |
15 |
simulation with sound effects. :-) |
16 |
|
17 |
|
18 |
Justin |
19 |
-- |
20 |
gentoo-science@l.g.o mailing list |