Gentoo Archives: gentoo-science

From: Thomas Beierlein <tomjbe@g.o>
To: gentoo-science@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-science] Gentoo Science next meeting agenda - 3) sub-herds
Date: Sun, 05 Dec 2010 16:45:12
Message-Id: 20101205174424.174dcfa4@ham
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-science] Gentoo Science next meeting agenda - 3) sub-herds by Rafael Goncalves Martins
1 On Sun, 5 Dec 2010 12:56:40 -0200
2 Rafael Goncalves Martins <rafaelmartins@g.o> wrote:
3
4 > On Sun, Dec 5, 2010 at 12:30 PM, Rafael Goncalves Martins
5 > <rafaelmartins@g.o> wrote:
6 > > On Sun, Dec 5, 2010 at 10:42 AM, Kacper Kowalik
7 > > <xarthisius@g.o> wrote:
8 > >> I think we reached an agreement last time, i.e. merge all herds
9 > >> into "sci". Should we just vote on it and make it happen?
10 > >
11 > > I'm not sure about which level of merging you mean. I'm only
12 > > interested in sci-electronics (that is now part of the Electronics
13 > > subrproject [1], so it have your own rules) and sci-mathematics
14 > > (just octave-related stuff), and I don't want to have my mailbox
15 > > overloaded with bug mails for science stuff that I don't care. This
16 > > is the reason why I just joined the herds, and not the science
17 > > project at all.
18 > >
19 > > Regards,
20 > >
21 > > [1] http://www.gentoo.org/proj/en/science/electronics/
22 > >
23 >
24 > Additionally, we didn't agreed on this in the last meeting. It was not
25 > discussed at all, just mentioned.
26
27 Rafael: ++
28
29 Anyway I will try to be there.
30
31 Regards,
32 Thomas.