List Archive: gentoo-science
Note: Due to technical difficulties, the Archives are currently not up to date.
provides an alternative service for most mailing lists.c.f. bug 424647
2012/4/4 Steven Lembark <lembark@...>:
> On Thu, 15 Mar 2012 11:15:41 +0100
> Kacper Kowalik <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
>> On 03/15/2012 11:03 AM, Oliver Borm wrote:
>> > Hi,
>> > what are with users that only have write access to the original overlay?
>> > Do they need a github account in order to further contribute to the sci
>> > overlay?
>> It's not mandatory so they don't need to, though I've strongly encourage
>> to do so.
>> > What will happen if they push their changes just to g.o.g ?
>> When a person with access to both repos does git pull --all, it pull
>> changes from both, and during push --all it will be naturally migrated
>> to github. Of course it also works the other way around. As far as my
>> short experience with that workflow goes it's almost indistinguishable
>> to what we had so far. Only pull/push time is slightly longer
> It might be worth adding a "stable" branch to the
> repository. Goal there is that changes to into the
> trunk and ones found to work or that pass more tests
> can get selectively merged into the stable branch.
> Makes it easeir to catch minor bugs after a commit.
IMO, stable stuff should go in the default portage tree (gx86). I am
against having too many layers of "stable".
> Steven Lembark 3646 Flora Pl
> Workhorse Computing St Louis, MO 63110
> lembark@... +1 888 359 3508