From: | Kacper Kowalik <xarthisius@g.o> |
---|---|
To: | gentoo-science@l.g.o |
Subject: | [gentoo-science] Gentoo Science next meeting agenda - 5) fortran |
Date: | Sun, 05 Dec 2010 12:56:20 |
Message-Id: | 4CFB8BCC.3070106@gentoo.org |
1 | Again, for the reference and starting point for the discussion |
2 | Donnie's blog post: |
3 | http://bit.ly/dLwdFe |
4 | |
5 | Additionally we should think about what compilers we're gonna support |
6 | (in term of b.g.o). I would like to stick to Intel and GFortran. |
7 | I have access to PGI, Pathscale and SunStudio but they were always a |
8 | PITA to use for me, so I would like to avoid them if possible... |
9 | Cheers, |
10 | Kacper |
File name | MIME type |
---|---|
signature.asc | application/pgp-signature |
Subject | Author |
---|---|
Re: [gentoo-science] Gentoo Science next meeting agenda - 5) fortran | George Shapovalov <george@g.o> |