| 1 |
Hello François, |
| 2 |
|
| 3 |
thanks for this work, but as the paraview ebuild in the portage tree is |
| 4 |
not yet stable, I have hardmasked your ebuild in the science overlay. |
| 5 |
Otherwise everybody who does use the science overlay will automatically |
| 6 |
be a beta tester of your ebuild. |
| 7 |
|
| 8 |
Oliver |
| 9 |
|
| 10 |
François Bissey schrieb: |
| 11 |
> Hi, |
| 12 |
> |
| 13 |
> I wanted to test the OverView application shipped with paraview so I ended |
| 14 |
> up touching the ebuild. As a side effect I ported it to the cmake-utils eclass |
| 15 |
> found out why a number of plugin didn't configure or compile (all related |
| 16 |
> to OverView actually). Did a bit of cleaning on the dependencies and |
| 17 |
> requirements. The ebuild is full of comment and I can provide more if needed. |
| 18 |
> I am sure paraview as gotten faster on my computer as a result but I am not |
| 19 |
> entirely sure which bit did that. |
| 20 |
> So it install OverView, manually because there isn't an install target for it, |
| 21 |
> and it seems to work as far as it goes. The install procedure is raw. |
| 22 |
> Comments and suggestions welcome. |
| 23 |
> |
| 24 |
> Francois |
| 25 |
> |
| 26 |
> |
Archives