1 |
I don't think you can run an mpich compiled executable with lam. I think |
2 |
one possible way would be to create your own ebuild file (copy of the |
3 |
mpich ebuild) and change the dependencies there. |
4 |
|
5 |
Glenn Johnson wrote: |
6 |
|
7 |
>Is there a way to use lam-mpi for a program (closed source) compiled |
8 |
>against mpich? If that is possible then that would be an option. I |
9 |
>have never had to have X installed for mpich before. It looks like |
10 |
>something that went into the most recent two e-builds. |
11 |
> |
12 |
>On 11/16/05, Philippe Trottier <tchiwam@g.o> wrote: |
13 |
> |
14 |
> |
15 |
>>Glenn Johnson wrote: |
16 |
>> |
17 |
>> |
18 |
>>>I am trying to upgrade mpich to version 1.2.7_p1 and it wants to |
19 |
>>>install xorg and friends. I do not want X11 and have never had it |
20 |
>>>installed in the past. Does mpich really need xorg? If not, then how |
21 |
>>>can I tell portage about it? |
22 |
>>> |
23 |
>>>Thanks. |
24 |
>>>-- |
25 |
>>>Glenn Johnson |
26 |
>>> |
27 |
>>> |
28 |
>>I have stooped using mpich and started use lam-mpi take a look at that ? |
29 |
>> |
30 |
>>I have never tried mpich without X so I cannot say much more. |
31 |
>> |
32 |
>>Phil |
33 |
>> |
34 |
>> |
35 |
>> |
36 |
>>-- |
37 |
>>gentoo-science@g.o mailing list |
38 |
>> |
39 |
>> |
40 |
>> |
41 |
>> |
42 |
> |
43 |
> |
44 |
>-- |
45 |
>Glenn Johnson |
46 |
> |
47 |
> |
48 |
> |
49 |
|
50 |
-- |
51 |
gentoo-science@g.o mailing list |