Note: Due to technical difficulties, the Archives are currently not up to date.
GMANE provides an alternative service for most mailing lists. c.f. bug 424647
> EL Sat, 4 Jun 2011 12:15:18 +1200
>
> ls -la /usr/lib64/libcblas.so
> lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 26 2 jun 13:44 /usr/lib64/libcblas.so ->
> blas/reference/libcblas.so
>
> ls -la /usr/lib64/libblas.so
> lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 25 2 jun 13:43 /usr/lib64/libblas.so ->
> blas/reference/libblas.so
>
> ls -la /usr/lib64/liblapack.so
> lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 29 2 jun 13:47 /usr/lib64/liblapack.so ->
> lapack/reference/liblapack.so
>
> It looks reasonable to me.
It does. Yet your scipy doesn't link to anything blas related according
to the output of ldd that you sent.
I note you are using numpy-1.6.0 I don't if that's linked to that but sage
will not work properly with it:
http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/11334
Can you try again with numpy-1.5.1 at least.
And then what are the outputs of:
ldd /usr/lib64/python2.7/site-packages/numpy/core/_dotblas.so
ldd /usr/lib64/python2.7/site-packages/numpy/linalg/lapack_lite.so
Francois
|
|
