| 1 |
Apparently it's more than a "proposal" ... tonight's "emerge --sync" |
| 2 |
moved some packages, breaking some ebuilds in the process. I haven't dug |
| 3 |
into it enough to file a bug yet, though. |
| 4 |
|
| 5 |
Markus Dittrich wrote: |
| 6 |
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- |
| 7 |
> Hash: SHA1 |
| 8 |
> |
| 9 |
> On Sun, 29 Jan 2006, Donnie Berkholz wrote: |
| 10 |
> |
| 11 |
>> Now the question is, can we put less general-purpose visualization |
| 12 |
>> programs there? For example, molecular graphics programs. |
| 13 |
>> |
| 14 |
>> |
| 15 |
> |
| 16 |
> I would tend to say yes, since molecular graphics programs can vizualize |
| 17 |
> everything from small molecules to large biomolecular systems. |
| 18 |
> Hence, I would have a hard time deciding if, e.g. VMD should |
| 19 |
> be sci-biology or sci-chemistry, whereas sci-visualization seems |
| 20 |
> natural. I would really like to hear opinions before I commit |
| 21 |
> VMD to portage. |
| 22 |
> |
| 23 |
> Thanks, |
| 24 |
> Markus |
| 25 |
> |
| 26 |
> |
| 27 |
> |
| 28 |
> - -- |
| 29 |
> Markus Dittrich (markusle) |
| 30 |
> Gentoo Linux Developer |
| 31 |
> Scientific applications |
| 32 |
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- |
| 33 |
> Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (GNU/Linux) |
| 34 |
> |
| 35 |
> iD8DBQFD3XoexlRwCwb7k40RAsShAJ9LCa/KwEGKf/PVHs/vUn0m/yC3WACfSkCc |
| 36 |
> qPKdDYNN1IUazka2mD7s61I= |
| 37 |
> =nF+q |
| 38 |
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- |
| 39 |
> |
| 40 |
|
| 41 |
-- |
| 42 |
M. Edward (Ed) Borasky |
| 43 |
|
| 44 |
http://linuxcapacityplanning.com |
| 45 |
|
| 46 |
-- |
| 47 |
gentoo-science@g.o mailing list |
Archives