Gentoo Logo
Gentoo Spaceship




Note: Due to technical difficulties, the Archives are currently not up to date. GMANE provides an alternative service for most mailing lists.
c.f. bug 424647
List Archive: gentoo-science
Navigation:
Lists: gentoo-science: < Prev By Thread Next > < Prev By Date Next >
Headers:
To: gentoo-science@g.o
From: Johan Hattne <jhattne@...>
Subject: Re: new blas infrastructure and prefix
Date: Tue, 30 Aug 2011 14:33:32 -0700
On 30 Aug 2011, at 12:49, fbissey@... wrote:

> Hi all,
> 
> So I was looking at the science overlay from my prefix on OS X.
> And portage wanted me to upgrade my blas/cblas/lapack stack to the
> new structure. I know they are marked ~x86 and ~amd64 but it doesn't
> look good considering that I had a working stack in my prefix before.
> 
> So I may make things a little more prefix friendly (OS X in particular)
> in the coming days. I am also thinking of adding an ebuild to use the
> native vectorize framework on OS X, unless someone strongly objects to it.

Hi Francois;

With the CBLAS reference implementations, you may run into a problem with the test suite on Darwin.  I tried to sort this out earlier this year (see http://icl.cs.utk.edu/lapack-forum/archives/lapack/msg00997.html), but I'm not even sure upstream recognises the problem.  Please let me know if at least you can reproduce the issue, and then maybe we can try again to get it fixed.

// Best wishes; Johan



Replies:
Re: new blas infrastructure and prefix
-- fbissey
Re: new blas infrastructure and prefix
-- fbissey
References:
new blas infrastructure and prefix
-- fbissey
Navigation:
Lists: gentoo-science: < Prev By Thread Next > < Prev By Date Next >
Previous by thread:
new blas infrastructure and prefix
Next by thread:
Re: new blas infrastructure and prefix
Previous by date:
new blas infrastructure and prefix
Next by date:
Re: new blas infrastructure and prefix


Updated Jul 05, 2012

Summary: Archive of the gentoo-science mailing list.

Donate to support our development efforts.

Copyright 2001-2013 Gentoo Foundation, Inc. Questions, Comments? Contact us.