Gentoo Archives: gentoo-science

From: Miguel Barao <mjsb@×××××××××××××××.pt>
To: gentoo-science@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-science] question about signbit
Date: Thu, 27 Oct 2005 14:26:05
Message-Id: 200510271524.54132.mjsb@ramses.inesc-id.pt
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-science] question about signbit by Darren Dale
1 On Thursday 27 October 2005 13:52, Darren Dale wrote:
2 >
3 > Here is another test:
4 >
5 > #include <math.h>
6 > #include <stdio.h>
7 >
8 > int main() {
9 > printf("signbit(-1): %d\n", signbit(-1));
10 > printf("isnan(0.0/0): %d\n", isnan(0.0/0));
11 > printf("isinf(1.0/0): %d\n", isinf(1.0/0));
12 > return 0;
13 > }
14 >
15 > which yields:
16 >
17 > signbit(-1): -2147483648
18 > isnan(0.0/0): 1
19 > isinf(1.0/0): 1
20 >
21 > Do you know why signbit doesn't yield 1?
22
23 The answer is in 'man signbit'.
24
25 signbit is probably just ANDing your float value with 2^31=0x80000000 which
26 reads -2147483648 if considered as a signed int (like in your printf).
27
28 Miguel
29 --
30 gentoo-science@g.o mailing list

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-science] question about signbit Ertugrul Soeylemez <never@××××××××××.org>