| 1 |
On Wed, 8 Jun 2011 08:07:10 +1200 |
| 2 |
Francois Bissey <fbissey@××××××××××××.nz> wrote: |
| 3 |
|
| 4 |
> > EL Tue, 7 Jun 2011 07:33:27 +1200 |
| 5 |
> > |
| 6 |
> > Francois Bissey <fbissey@××××××××××××.nz> escrigué: |
| 7 |
> > > I note you are using numpy-1.6.0 I don't if that's linked to that but |
| 8 |
> > > sage will not work properly with it: |
| 9 |
> > > http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/11334 |
| 10 |
> > > Can you try again with numpy-1.5.1 at least. |
| 11 |
> > |
| 12 |
> > I am a bit surprised, but downgrading numpy actually worked. Thanks a |
| 13 |
> > lot for your help, Francois! Sage-4.7 should depend on ~numpy-1.5.1 |
| 14 |
> > then, since it already depends on >=numpy-1.5.1. |
| 15 |
> > |
| 16 |
> > > And then what are the outputs of: |
| 17 |
> > > ldd /usr/lib64/python2.7/site-packages/numpy/core/_dotblas.so |
| 18 |
> > > ldd /usr/lib64/python2.7/site-packages/numpy/linalg/lapack_lite.so |
| 19 |
> > |
| 20 |
> > They link to lapack, blas and cblas, and they didn't change when I |
| 21 |
> > downgraded numpy. |
| 22 |
> |
| 23 |
> I fixed the numpy dependencies in the sage tree. It is still curious that |
| 24 |
> scipy didn't apparently build properly when using numpy-1.6.0. Someone should |
| 25 |
> investigate that. |
| 26 |
> |
| 27 |
> Francois |
| 28 |
> |
| 29 |
|
| 30 |
It appears that this issue may arise somewhere in the distutils that's shipped |
| 31 |
with numpy-1.6.0. We'll see. See bug |
| 32 |
|
| 33 |
http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=371099 |
| 34 |
|
| 35 |
Steve |
Archives