Archives
Archives
| From: | "Sébastien Fabbro" <bicatali@g.o> | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| To: | gentoo-science@l.g.o | ||
| Subject: | Re: [gentoo-science] should we have virtual/clapack | ||
| Date: | Mon, 07 Dec 2009 17:30:02 | ||
| Message-Id: | 20091207092932.0e56aafb@canfar.phys.uvic.ca | ||
| In Reply to: | [gentoo-science] should we have virtual/clapack by "François Bissey" |
||
| 1 | On Sunday 06 December, François Bissey wrote: |
| 2 | |
| 3 | > on a clapack implementations. So should we plan for a virtual/clapack? |
| 4 | |
| 5 | I don't know of an official ANSI/ISO C API for clapack. |
| 6 | The netlib clapack implementation is a f2c'ed conversion from |
| 7 | Fortran lapack. There is another clapack in ATLAS, which has a |
| 8 | different API, and does not cover all LAPACK routines. |
| 9 | |
| 10 | -- |
| 11 | Sebastien |
| Subject | Author |
|---|---|
| Re: [gentoo-science] should we have virtual/clapack | "François Bissey" <f.r.bissey@×××××××××.nz> |