List Archive: gentoo-science
Note: Due to technical difficulties, the Archives are currently not up to date.
provides an alternative service for most mailing lists.c.f. bug 424647
2012/4/4 Christoph Junghans <email@example.com>:
> 2012/4/4 Steven Lembark <lembark@...>:
>> On Thu, 15 Mar 2012 11:15:41 +0100
>> Kacper Kowalik <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
>>> On 03/15/2012 11:03 AM, Oliver Borm wrote:
>>> > Hi,
>>> > what are with users that only have write access to the original overlay?
>>> > Do they need a github account in order to further contribute to the sci
>>> > overlay?
>>> It's not mandatory so they don't need to, though I've strongly encourage
>>> to do so.
>>> > What will happen if they push their changes just to g.o.g ?
>>> When a person with access to both repos does git pull --all, it pull
>>> changes from both, and during push --all it will be naturally migrated
>>> to github. Of course it also works the other way around. As far as my
>>> short experience with that workflow goes it's almost indistinguishable
>>> to what we had so far. Only pull/push time is slightly longer
>> It might be worth adding a "stable" branch to the
>> repository. Goal there is that changes to into the
>> trunk and ones found to work or that pass more tests
>> can get selectively merged into the stable branch.
>> Makes it easeir to catch minor bugs after a commit.
> IMO, stable stuff should go in the default portage tree (gx86). I am
> against having too many layers of "stable".
I second that. For stable is the main tree.