| 1 |
2012/2/7 Alexey Shvetsov <alexxy@g.o>: |
| 2 |
> fbissey@××××××××××××.nz писал 2012-02-07 23:52: |
| 3 |
> |
| 4 |
>> Quoting Sébastien Fabbro <bicatali@g.o>: |
| 5 |
>> |
| 6 |
>>> Hi, |
| 7 |
>>> |
| 8 |
>>> We are contemplating the idea of switching the official science overlay |
| 9 |
>>> to an external repository such as github. Here are some of the |
| 10 |
>>> advantages we would like to |
| 11 |
>>> get: |
| 12 |
>>> 1. easier to contribute |
| 13 |
>>> 2. specific issue tracker |
| 14 |
>>> 3. wiki |
| 15 |
>>> |
| 16 |
>> Other people have made useful comments already. The only point that I |
| 17 |
>> think |
| 18 |
>> is interesting about github is the possibility to clone the overlay and |
| 19 |
>> have |
| 20 |
>> pull requests. |
| 21 |
>> Effectively that means people can contribute without ever getting infra |
| 22 |
>> involved and an external contributor can send a pull request even if they |
| 23 |
>> are |
| 24 |
>> not a member of the github science team. |
| 25 |
> Actualy you can send pull request even now =) Its git. See for example linux |
| 26 |
> kernel related work |
| 27 |
I like the idea of making contributions as easy as possible! |
| 28 |
|
| 29 |
Actually we could test github for a while and leave the default |
| 30 |
overlay on gentoo and merge every XXX hrs. |
| 31 |
|
| 32 |
-- |
| 33 |
Christoph Junghans |
| 34 |
http://dev.gentoo.org/~ottxor/ |
Archives