Gentoo Archives: gentoo-science

From: VulK <etn45p4m@×××××.com>
To: gentoo-science@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-science] sage queues
Date: Fri, 12 Aug 2011 03:26:10
Message-Id: 20110812032445.GA29583@mistaya.nunet.neu.edu
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-science] sage queues by fbissey@slingshot.co.nz
1 * fbissey@××××××××××××.nz <fbissey@××××××××××××.nz> [2011-08-09 17:21:10]:
2
3 > Quoting VulK <etn45p4m@×××××.com>:
4 >
5 > > Hi,
6 > > Thank you for the explanation: I kind of guessed that some part of sage were
7 > > omitted to adapt the two packaging system but your explanation gave me the
8 > > details I was missing.
9 > > As you said the combinat queue is/should be a real mess of continuous
10 > > updates (at least this is what I was told) so I am not entirely sure how well
11 > > an e-build would perform, in case you decide to spend some time on it I will
12 > > gladly be a guinea pig for testing it out.
13 > > I do not understand sage package system in details so my request may just be
14 > > stupid but is it possible to produce separate ebuilds for the different part
15 > > of sage that are now stripped? If not for all of those can this be
16 > > done for the
17 > > various packages in $SAGE_ROOT/devel ? If an e-build is not feasible, can
18 > > USE flags be used to select which extensions to include at compile time?
19 > >
20 > The details are a bit long to explain but everything provided by sage is
21 > currently split. Technically what is missing is some scripts from the spkg
22 > sage_scripts (provided by our sage-baselayout ebuild). Most of the files in
23 > $SAGE_LOCAL/bin of a vanilla install that starts with sage are provided
24 > by this
25 > spkg. And we omit a lot of them, some are already installed only on use flag
26 > request. We could add more if it was useful and feasible from a package
27 > management perspective.
28 >
29 > I must say that talking with sage-developers interested in sage installed with
30 > portage there is a possibility that some stuff may come back in some form once
31 > we figured it out.
32
33 Do you mean that in a distant future sage package system *might* become
34 portage?
35
36 > Something like sage -combinat creates a new sage branch.
37 > There is a possibility that we could allow such a branch to be created
38 > inside a
39 > user account (not system wide) and allow its use. But that's still some
40 > way off
41 > on my map. In fact it may come as a surprise to my fellow sage-on-gentoo devs.
42 >
43 > Francois
44 >
45 >
46 VulK

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-science] sage queues fbissey@××××××××××××.nz