Gentoo Logo
Gentoo Spaceship




Note: Due to technical difficulties, the Archives are currently not up to date. GMANE provides an alternative service for most mailing lists.
c.f. bug 424647
List Archive: gentoo-science
Navigation:
Lists: gentoo-science: < Prev By Thread Next > < Prev By Date Next >
Headers:
To: gentoo-science@g.o
From: "M. Edward (Ed) Borasky" <znmeb@...>
Subject: Re: lapack transition
Date: Sun, 21 Aug 2005 09:00:40 -0700
I just got an email from Clint Whaley on the Atlas mailing list. He's 
sent out 3.7.11 with bugfixes. Given the re-org, should I post a request 
for 3.7.11 on bugzilla? When is the re-org going to happen?

Peter Bienstman wrote:

>On Sunday 21 August 2005 17:33, M. Edward (Ed) Borasky wrote:
>  
>
>>I just returned to this list -- what is the "new infrastructure" we are
>>"preparing for"?
>>    
>>
>
>The ability to switch between different lapack implementations (reference, 
>ATLAS, later perhaps MKL) at run time.
>
>  
>
>>Could we get a "testing/unstable" Atlas in Portage? Right now, they are
>>at 3.7.10, and I only see a 3.7.10 for blas-atlas, not for atlas itself
>>or lapack-atlas. I think the x86-64 users will want 3.7.10 across the
>>board, and might also want to be able to compile selected code with GCC 4.
>>    
>>
>
>That's also on the TODO list.
>
>Peter
>  
>
-- 
gentoo-science@g.o mailing list


Replies:
Re: lapack transition
-- Peter Bienstman
References:
lapack transition
-- Peter Bienstman
Re: lapack transition
-- M. Edward (Ed) Borasky
Re: lapack transition
-- Peter Bienstman
Navigation:
Lists: gentoo-science: < Prev By Thread Next > < Prev By Date Next >
Previous by thread:
Re: lapack transition
Next by thread:
Re: lapack transition
Previous by date:
Re: lapack transition
Next by date:
Re: lapack transition


Updated Jun 17, 2009

Summary: Archive of the gentoo-science mailing list.

Donate to support our development efforts.

Copyright 2001-2013 Gentoo Foundation, Inc. Questions, Comments? Contact us.