| 1 |
Alexey Shvetsov <alexxy@g.o> wrote: |
| 2 |
|
| 3 |
>> I dont like this idea |
| 4 |
>> 1. it will not be easyer to contribute, better to ask infra to setup |
| 5 |
>> patchwork or gerrit |
| 6 |
>> 2. there is gentoo bugzilla and tag [science overlay] |
| 7 |
>> 3. wiki.gentoo.org up and running |
| 8 |
|
| 9 |
1. much faster to open an account on github than to go through a chain |
| 10 |
of emails between the contributor, infra and gentoo devs. |
| 11 |
1. easier to track clones and pull |
| 12 |
1. good luck having a code reviewing tool accepted by infra within a |
| 13 |
reasonable time frame |
| 14 |
2. bugzilla + tag [science overlay] is a hack prone to human mistake |
| 15 |
that gives unnecessary work to bugs scanners, whereas a unified |
| 16 |
scm+issue system going straight to the dev |
| 17 |
3. wiki.g.o is up but not unified to a specific project, I have not |
| 18 |
seen a single sci contribution yet |
| 19 |
|
| 20 |
It would be awesome to have infra set up Gentoo projects with a nice |
| 21 |
unified web+wiki+issue tracker+repo. Unfortunately I don't see it |
| 22 |
happening in the next year or so. Meanwhile external solutions exist. |
| 23 |
Basically the idea is to reduce work load and bureaucracy while |
| 24 |
improving code quality. |
| 25 |
|
| 26 |
-- |
| 27 |
Sébastien |
Archives