| 1 |
Two comments/questions on this issue: |
| 2 |
1) I have successfully installed the g95 compiler (no ebuild), and once configured properly, emerge does end up using it. I installed Octave, and autoconfig found and apparently used g95. Might that be a good, free (as in speech) alternative to ifc? |
| 3 |
2) Does anyone know what the status is for gcc-4, with support for Fortran 90/95? |
| 4 |
|
| 5 |
I'm not using Fortran much these days, but I can give a shot at writing an ebuild for g95 and submit a bug. |
| 6 |
|
| 7 |
Cheers, |
| 8 |
Matthew |
| 9 |
|
| 10 |
Donnie Berkholz <spyderous@g.o> wrote: I'm beginning to work on a number of packages that require F90, so I may |
| 11 |
be working to improve the eclass and so forth soon, depending on how |
| 12 |
things go. I know we need a tc-getF77() and tc-getF90(), not sure what |
| 13 |
other needs we have -- need to research the bugs a bit. |
| 14 |
|
| 15 |
Current codes for quantum chemistry are on my overlay: |
| 16 |
http://dev.gentoo.org/~spyderous/overlay/sci-chemistry/ -- the new ones |
| 17 |
are abinit, psi and espresso. Others showing up soon will be schakal, |
| 18 |
gabedit, yaehmop. |
| 19 |
|
| 20 |
The ccp4/coot ebuilds are for crystallography and aren't yet working |
| 21 |
well enough for portage, but they work OK for local use ( coot 0.1 is |
| 22 |
broken, ccp4 has rpath issues ). |
| 23 |
|
| 24 |
Espresso brings up an interesting question -- should we be able to add |
| 25 |
packages that do not compile at all with gcc but do with ifc? |
| 26 |
|
| 27 |
Thanks, |
| 28 |
Donnie |
| 29 |
|
| 30 |
|
| 31 |
|
| 32 |
|
| 33 |
--------------------------------- |
| 34 |
Relax. Yahoo! Mail virus scanning helps detect nasty viruses! |
Archives