Gentoo Archives: gentoo-science

From: "M. Edward (Ed) Borasky" <znmeb@×××××××.net>
To: gentoo-science@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-science] New category proposal - sci-vis
Date: Mon, 30 Jan 2006 14:52:45
Message-Id: 43DE27F0.9030105@cesmail.net
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-science] New category proposal - sci-vis by "Marcus D. Hanwell"
1 Marcus D. Hanwell wrote:
2 > On Monday 30 January 2006 06:35, M. Edward (Ed) Borasky wrote:
3 >
4 >> Apparently it's more than a "proposal" ... tonight's "emerge --sync"
5 >> moved some packages, breaking some ebuilds in the process. I haven't dug
6 >> into it enough to file a bug yet, though.
7 >>
8 >
9 > Top posting does break the flow of conversation, but I already said a fair few
10 > posts up that I had completed the initial move of 17 packages to the new
11 > sci-visualization category after asking for commend here months ago, and
12 > comment on -dev weeks ago.
13 >
14 > No further packages have been moved that I can see, and the only small
15 > breakage was the opendx-samples dep on opendx. I have manually scanned
16 > through the tree for any other broken deps and cannot find any.
17 >
18 My maxima 5.9.2 ebuild from the sci overlay is looking for gnuplot in
19 the old category. Don't know if the older maxima ebuilds have the same
20 problem; I run bleeding edge science software on most of my machines.
21
22 --
23 M. Edward (Ed) Borasky
24
25 http://linuxcapacityplanning.com
26
27 --
28 gentoo-science@g.o mailing list