| 1 |
On 21/01/10 20:35, Johan Hattne wrote: |
| 2 |
> On 01/21/10 13:13, Justin wrote: |
| 3 |
>> On 21/01/10 19:58, Johan Hattne wrote: |
| 4 |
>>> Hullo again; |
| 5 |
>>> |
| 6 |
>>> The 1.4.7 pointless distfile is off the Cambridge ftp. Instead, they've |
| 7 |
>>> released 1.4.8. The latter version builds just fine with the 1.4.7 |
| 8 |
>>> ebuild, however it fails three of the tests--I don't know what's wrong yet. |
| 9 |
>>> |
| 10 |
>>> // Cheers; Johan |
| 11 |
>>> |
| 12 |
>>> |
| 13 |
>> Yeah I know the tests are broken. |
| 14 |
> |
| 15 |
> OK, then I know. |
| 16 |
> |
| 17 |
> While I'm at it... this particular ebuild looks "prefix-aware". Is |
| 18 |
> anybody using prefix portage with the science overlay? Will you accept |
| 19 |
> patches to that end? |
| 20 |
> |
| 21 |
> // Cheers; Johan |
| 22 |
> |
| 23 |
|
| 24 |
Same to me, I have a prefixed science package git overlay. Currently |
| 25 |
only nmr stuff, but I am also porting xray packages. Drop the patches to me. |
| 26 |
|
| 27 |
|
| 28 |
https://gitweb.j-schmitz.net/pub/?p=sciprefix.git;a=summary |
Archives